|
"The Secret Doctrine"
And Its Study
Being extracts from the notes of personal teachings given
by H.P. Blavatsky to private pupils during the years 1888 to
1891, included in a large manuscript volume left to me by my
father, who was one of the pupils. -P.G. Bowen
H.P.B was specially interesting upon the matter of "The
Secret Doctrine" during the past week. I had better try
to sort it all out and get it safely down on paper while it is
fresh in my mind. As she said herself, it may be useful to someone
thirty or forty years hence. The Secret Doctrine is only
quite a small fragment of Esoteric Doctrine known to the higher
members of the Occult Brotherhoods. It contains, she says, just
as much as can be received by the world during this coming century.
"The World" (she explained) means Man living in the
Personal Nature. This "world" will find in the two
volumes of the S.D. all its utmost comprehension can grasp,
but no more. But this is not to say that the Disciple who is
not living in "the world" cannot find any more in the
books than the "world" finds. Every form, no matter
how crude, contains the image of its "creator" concealed
within it. So likewise does an author's work, no matter how obscure,
contain the concealed image of the author's knowledge. ...From
this saying, I take it that the S.D. must contain all
that H.P.B. knows herself, and a great deal more than that, seeing
that much of it comes from men whose knowledge is immensely wider
than hers. Furthermore, she implies unmistakably that another
may well find knowledge in it which she does not possess herself.
It is a stimulating thought to consider that it is possible that
I myself may find in H.P.B.'s words knowledge of which she herself
is unconscious. She dwelt on this idea a good deal. X said afterwards:
"H.P.B. must be losing her grip," meaning I suppose,
confidence, in her own knowledge. But... and, ...myself, also,
see her meaning better, I think. She is telling us without a
doubt not to anchor ourselves to her as the final authority,
nor to anyone else, but to depend altogether upon our own widening
perceptions.
(Later note on above: I was right. I put it to her direct
and she nodded and smiled. It was worth something to get her
approving smile!)
At last we have managed to get H.P.B. to put us right on the
matter of the study of the S.D. Let me get it down while
it is all fresh in mind. Reading the S.D. page by page
as one reads any other book (she says) will only end us in confusion.
The first thing to do, even if it takes years, it to get some
grasp of the "Three Fundamental Principles" given in
the Proem. Follow that up by study of the Recapitulation-the
numbered items in the Summing Up to Volume I, Part I. Then take
the Preliminary Notes (Vol. II) and the Conclusion (Vol.II)...
H.P.B. seems pretty definite about the importance of the teaching
(in the Conclusion) relating to the times of coming of the Races
and Sub-Races. She put it more plainly than usual that there
is really no such thing as a future "coming" of races.
"There is neither COMING nor PASSING, but eternal BECOMING,"
she says. The Fourth Root-race is still alive. So are the Third
and Second and First-that is, their manifestations on our present
plane of substance as present. I know that she means, I think,
but it is beyond me to get it down in words. So likewise the
Sixth Sub-Race is here, and the Sixth Root-Race, and the Seventh,
and even people of the coming Rounds. After all, that's understandable.
Disciples and Brothers and Adepts can't be people of the everyday
Fifth Sub-Race, for the race is a state of evolution.
But she leaves no question but that, as far as humanity at
large goes, we are hundreds of years (in time and space) from
even the Sixth Sub-Race. I thought H.P.B. showed a peculiar anxiety
in her insistence on this point. She hinted at "dangers
and delusions" coming through ideas that the New Race had
dawned definitely on the World. According to her the duration
of a Sub-Race for humanity at large, coincides with that of the
Sidereal Year (the circle of the earth's axis-about 25,000 years).
That puts the new race a long way off.
We have had a remarkable session on the study of the S.D.
during the past three weeks. I must sort out my notes and get
the result safely down before I lose them.
She talked a good deal about the "Fundamental Principles."
She says: "If one images that one is going to get a satisfactory
picture of the constitution of the Universe from the S.D.
one will get only confusion from its study. It is not meant to
give any such final verdict on existence, but to lead towards
the truth." She repeated this latter expression many
times. It is worse than useless going to those whom we imagine
to be advanced students (she said) and asking them to give us
an "interpretation" of the S.D. They cannot
do it. If they try, all they give are cut and dried exoteric
renderings which do not remotely resemble the Truth. To accept
such interpretation means anchoring ourselves to fixed ideas,
whereas Truth lies beyond any ideas we can formulate or express.
Exoteric interpretations are all very well, and she does not
condemn them so long as they are taken as pointers for beginners,
and are not accepted by them as anything more. Many persons who
are in, or will in the future be in, the T.S. are of course potentially
incapable of any advance beyond the range of a common exoteric
conception. But there are, and will be others, and for them she
sets out the following and true way of approach to the S.D.
Some to the S.D. (she says) without any hope of getting
the final Truth of existence from it, or with any ideas other
than seeing how far it may lead towards the Truth. See
in study a means of exercising and developing the mind never
touched by other studies. Observe the following rules.
No matter what one may study in the S.D. let the mind
hold fast, as the basis of its ideation, to the following ideas:
a) The fundamental unity of all existence. This unity is a
thing altogether different from the common notion of unity-as
when we say that a nation or an army is united; or that this
planet is united to that by lines of magnetic force or the like.
The teaching is not that. It is that existence is one thing,
not any collection of things linked together. Fundamentally,
there is ONE BEING. This Being has two aspects, positive and
negative. The positive is Spirit, or consciousness. The
negative is substance, the subject of consciousness. This
Being is the Absolute in its primary manifestation. Being absolute
there is nothing outside it. It is ALL BEING. It is indivisible,
else it would not be absolute. If a portion could be separated,
that remaining could not be absolute, because there would at
once arise the question of comparison between it and the
separated part. Comparison is incompatible with any idea of absoluteness.
Therefore it is clear that this Fundamental One Existence, or
Absolute Being, must be the Reality in every form there is...(I
said that though this was clear to me I did not think that many
in the Lodges would grasp it. "Theosophy," she said,
"is for those who can think, or for those who can drive
themselves to think, not mental sluggards." H.P.B. has grown
very mild of late. "Dumbskulls" used to be her name
for the average student.)
The Atom, the Man, the God (she says) are each separately,
as well as all collectively, Absolute Being in their last analysis,
that is their real individuality. It is this idea which
must be held always in the background of the mind to form the
basis for every conception that arises from study of the S.D.
The moment one lets it go (and it is most easy to do so when
engaged in any of the many intricate aspects of the Esoteric
Philosophy) the idea of separation supervenes, and the study
loses its value.
b) The second idea to hold fast to is that there is no
dead matter. Every last atom is alive. It cannot be otherwise,
since every atom is itself fundamentally Absolute Being. Therefore
there is no such thing as "spaces of ether," or Akasha,
or call it what you like, in which angels and elementals disport
themselves like trout in water. That's the common idea. The true
idea shows every atom of substance, no matter of what plane,
to be in itself a life.
c) The third basic idea to be held is that Man is the microcosm.
As he is so, then all the Hierarchies of the Heavens exist within
him. But in truth there is neither Macrocosm nor Microcosm but
ONE EXISTENCE. Great and small are such only as viewed by a limited
consciousness.
d)Fourth and last basic idea to be held is that expressed
in the Great Hermetic Axiom. It really sums up and synthesizes
all the others: "As in the inner, so is the outer, as is
the great, so is the small; as it is above, so it is below; there
is but One Life and Law: and he that worketh it is ONE. Nothing
is inner, nothing is outer; nothing is great, nothing is small;
nothing is high, nothing is low, in the Divine Economy."
No matter what one takes as study in the S.D. one must
correlate it with those basic ideas.
I suggested that this is a kind of mental exercise which must
be excessively fatiguing. H.P.B. smiled and nodded. One must
not be a fool (she said) and drive oneself into the madhouse
by attempting too much at first. The brain is the instrument
of waking consciousness, and every conscious mental picture formed
means change and destruction of the atoms of the brain. Ordinary
intellectual activity moves on well-beaten paths in the brain,
and does not compel sudden adjustments and destructions in its
substance. But this new kind of mental effort calls for something
very different-the carving out of new "brain paths,"
the ranking in different order of the little brain lives. If
forced injudiciously it may do serious physical harm to the brain.
This mode of thinking (she says) is what the Indians call
Jnana Yoga. As one progresses in Jnana Yoga one
finds conceptions arising which, though one is conscious of them,
one cannot express nor yet formulate into any sort of mental
picture. As time goes on these conceptions will form into mental
pictures. This is a time to be on guard and refuse to be deluded
with the idea that the new-found and wonderful picture must represent
reality. It does not. As one works on, one finds the once admired
picture growing dull and unsatisfying and finally fading out
or being thrown away. This is another danger point, because for
the moment one is left in a void without any conception to support
one, and one may be tempted to revive the cast-off picture for
want of a better to cling to. The true student will, however,
work on unconcerned, and presently further formless gleams come,
which again in time give rise to a larger and more beautiful
picture than the last. But the learner will now know that no
picture will ever represent the truth. This last splendid picture
will grow dull and fade like the others. And so the process goes
on, until at last the mind and its pictures are transcended and
the learner enters and dwells in the world of no-form, but of
which all forms are narrowed reflections.
The true student of The Secret Doctrine is a Jnana
Yogi, and this Path of Yoga is the True Path for the Western
student. It is to provide him with sign-posts on that Path that
The Secret Doctrine has been written.
Later note: I have read over this rendering of her teaching
to H.P.B., asking if I have got her right. She called me a silly
dumbskull to imagine anything can ever be put in words aright.
But she smiled and nodded as well, and said I had really got
it better than anyone else ever did, and better than she could
do it herself.
I wonder why I am getting all this. It should be passed to
the world, but I am too old ever to do it. I feel such a child
to H.P.B. and yet I am twenty years older than her in actual
years.
She has changed much since I met her two years ago. It is
marvelous how she holds up in the face of dire illness. If one
knew nothing and believed nothing, H.P.B. would convince one
that she is something away and beyond body and brain. I fell,
especially during these last meetings since she has become so
helpless bodily, that we are getting teachings from another and
higher sphere. We seem to feel and know what she says rather
than hear it with our bodily ears. X said much the same thing
last night.
Robert Bowen
(Comdr. R.N.)
19th April, 1891
Note.-These extracts from Robert Bowen's notes on H.P.B.'s
Secret Doctrine taken from The Theosophical Forum,
Aug. 1932, were reprinted in THEOSOPHY, Vol. 54.
Blavatsky Net
home | up | top |