IN THE LIGHT OF THEOSOPHY

Man and his natural environment are inextricably interlinked. We create our environment-for better or for worse. Millions of tons of toxic pollutants, greenhouse gases, that industry releases into the atmosphere, are taking their toll. Climate scientists from around the world have been sounding alarm bells since long. Now they have come out openly with the warning that humans are to blame for global warming, and if this continues, it could lead to disastrous consequences. Their conclusions, comments New Scientists (January 27), "send a tough message to politicians who have reached a deadlock in negotiations on how to combat soaring temperatures and sea levels."

This January, scientists met in Shanghai, China, to discuss the latest assessment form UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In their final text for policy makers, they tersely say, "Most of the warming is attributable to human activities." The report cites global melting as powerful evidence that the world really is warming. Since the 1960s, there has been a 20 per cent decrease in snow cover and a 40 per cent thinning of the Arctic ice cap. The scientists predict sea level will rise by between 9 and 88 centimetres by 2100, endangering millions of people in low-lying areas.

The report also warns that temperatures will rise by between 1.4 and 5.80C in the 21st century, depending on emissions of greenhouse gases.

We are all guilty. If we want to leave behind us a livable world for generations to come, action needs to be taken now and a restraint put on environmental pollution caused by overindustrialization and other human activities.

Sattler identified the bacteria after examining cloud samples collected and frozen onto Teflon plates set up on the top of Mount Sonnblick, near Salzburg, Austria. Even at subfreezing temperatures, the bacteria could take up radioactively tagged amino acids and DNA bases. This indicates the microbes were still growing and reproducing.

The bacteria could in influence climate by acting as nuclei around which rain droplets form. In addition, Sattler says, finding bacteria in clouds suggests that life could exist in similarly extreme surroundings on other planets. "Why not? I've done research in glaciers, Antarctic lakes, and in Alpine ice, but this is the most extreme habitat in which I've found bacteria," she says. "If anything happens to Earth, bacteria will survive."

This is another proof, if proof be needed, that microbes, bacteria, and the tutti quanti of the infinitesimally small exist everywhere in the universe. These lives, though invisible to us by virtue of their minuteness, have always surrounded us and have worked on, obedient to their own laws, and it is only as they are gradually being revealed that scientists have begun to take congnizance of them, as of the effects produced by them.

Spread across Syria, Lebanon Israel and Jordan, the Druse faith incorporates Gnostic and Neo-Platonic tenets. Druse history claims that the connection between Druse and Vedic culture goes back to the time of Al-Hakim. "At the time of establishing the Druse movement, A1-Hakim had several discussions with religious leaders around the world. He exchanged a number of ideas with Indian religious leaders who had been invited for the discussions," explains Hussein Aburukn. "He even exchanged religious texts. So much so that two of our books have actually been translated from the original Sanskrit to Arabic. One of them is A1 Mon Frad Pedateh (One Without a Second), which talks about one Supreme Lord. The other book has a whole section on Ayurveda, where some of the words and phrases have been retained in Sanskrit since they didn't have Arabic equivalents."

Besides Ayurveda and Sanskrit, the main evidence of connection between Druse and Hindu thought is the belief in the reincarnation of the soul. Both cultures believe in it strongly.

The Druses claim that their religion had "existed since the beginning of the world in the hearts and minds of saint"-an interesting claim in the light of H.P.B.'s calling it "one of the last survivals of the archaic Wisdom-Religion." In her article "Lamas and Druses," originally published in The Theosophist for June 1881, she says how difficult it is to fathom "the secret of the profoundly mystical beliefs of the Druses":

To begin with: A1-Hakim is not the founder of their sect. Their ritual and dogmas were never made known, but to those who have been admitted into their brotherhood. Their origin is next to unknown. As to their external religion, or rather what has transpired of it, that can be told in a few words. The Druses are believed to be mixture of Kurds, Mardi-Arabs, and other semi-civilized tribes. We humbly maintain that they are the descendants of, and a mixture of, mystics of all nations-mystics, who, in the face of cruel and unrelenting persecution by the orthodox Christian Church and orthodox Islamism, have ever since the first centuries of the Mohammedan propaganda, been gathered together, and who gradually made a permanent settlement in the fastnesses of Syria and Mount Lebanon, where they had from the first found refuge. Since then they have preserved the strictest upon their beliefs and truly occult rites….They are the Sikhs of Asia Minor, and their policy offers many points of similarity with the late "commonwealth" of the followers of Guru Nanak-even extending to their mysticism and indomitable bravery. But the two are still more closely related to a third and still more mysterious community of religionists, of which nothing, or next to nothing, is known by outsiders: we mean the fraternity of Tibetan Lamaists, known as the Brotherhood of Khelang, who mix but little with the rest.

Dwight G. Smith, professor and chairman of the biology department at Southern Connecticut State University in New Haven, U.S.A., writes in The World and I (March 2001):

Wings alone are insufficient for flight. The entire body must be appropriately sculpted to achieve maximum strength and lightness. In birds, these features govern the structures and functions of the feathers, skeleton, muscles, and internal systems….

Exactly how flight originated continues to be controversial. Of the many theories advanced, the two most plausible are labeled "from the ground up" and "from the trees down." John Ostrom of Yale University is a leading proponent of the theory that ancestral birds learned to fly from the ground up….Other scientists, however, believe that the ancestors of birds learned to fly by climbing into treetops and gliding from tree to tree or from trees to the ground, gradually transitioning from gliding to true flight.

In The Theosophist for August 1882, a correspondent asks whether the flight of birds and the swimming of fishes is produced at will, as in the case of the Yogis who can levitate themselves or walk upon the surface of the water. To this H.P.B. remarks:

Occult science explains the mysteries of bird-flying and fish-swimming on principles entirely opposed to the accepted scientific theory of the day…. "If," writes our correspondent, "we take the position that birds have the power to make themselves light or heavy at will, the phenomenon of their flight becomes easy to comprehend."

And why not take up such a position? Whether by instinct or will, whether an effect identical with another is produced consciously or unconsciously, by animal or man, the cause underlying that invariable and identical result must be one and the same, barring diversity of conditions and exceptions as to unimportant details….There must be something more than blind instinct or conscious volition. What is it? Occult science tells us the word: it is "a change of polarity and of normal gravity," not yet admissible by science. With birds and animals-as instinctive a mechanical action as any other they execute; with man, when he thus defies the familiar conditions of gravity, it is something he can acquire, in his training as a Yogi. Though the former act unconsciously, and he changes his polarity at will, the same cause is made operative, and both produce and identical effect. There are certainly alternating changes of polarity going on in the bird while ascending or dropping, and a maintenance of the same polarity while sailing at any given altitude.

Pessimism leads to hopelessness, sickness and failure, and is linked to depression, loneliness and painful shyness. "If we could teach people to think more positively," says psychologist Craig A. Anderson of Rice University in Houston, "it would be like inoculating them against these mental ills."

"Your abilities count," explains psychologist Michael F. Scheier of Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh, "but the belief that you can succeed affects whether or not you will." In part, that's because optimists and pessimists deal with the same challenges and disappointments in very different ways….

"If people feel hopeless," says Anderson, "they don't bother to acquire the skills they need to succeed." A sense of control, according to Anderson, is the litmus test for success. The optimist feels in control of his own life. If things are going badly, he acts quickly, looking for solutions, forming a new plan of action, and reaching out for advice. The pessimist feels like fate's plaything and moves slowly. He doesn't seek advice, since he assumes nothing can be done….

Many studies suggest that the pessimist's feeling of helplessness undermines the body's natural defences, the immune system. Dr. Christopher Peterson of the University of Michigan has found that the pessimist doesn't take good care of himself. Feeling passive and unable to dodge life's blows, he expects ill health and other misfortunes, no matter what he does….

Positive thinking leads to positive action- and reaction. What you expect from the world, the evidence suggests, is what you are likely to get.

Indeed, we are what we think. To a great extent, what we expect is what we get. Pessimism might seem a hard habit to break, but the dynamic power of thought and will can overcome all obstacles.

Truly, "modern science has little or no reason to boast of originality," as H.P.B. said in Isis Unveiled.

In the literal sense of the term, jihad means "an effort or striving." ….Al-Jihad al-Akbar or "the greater warfare" is against one's own demons….The perception of jihad in this sense is subjective and has moral implications. It involves a way of life in which fleeting temptations have no place. Individuals become discerning subjects who comprehend that worldly temptations are ephemeral and have to be fought. It is also the ability to suffer virtuously the afflictions caused by the foe by following the commandments of Allah and to preach, through education, art and literature, the precepts of Islam, the religion of Allah….

An Islamic scholar, Syed Qutb, observes: "Those who state that Islamic jihad was mainly for the defence of the 'homeland of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life and consider it less important than their 'homeland'. The jihad of Islam is to secure complete freedom for every man throughout the world by releasing him from servitude….so that he may serve God."…jihad has become a casual term for all acts of violence perpetrated by an Islamic group, individual or regime. Such groups and individuals need to be reminded about the "Greater jihad," only through which all the people on earth can find redemption.